So far I've just removed the test posts as off-topic and approved the comments on those posts since it doesn't matter anyway. Things seem to have died down now. The bot is useful but I fear every thread will turn into a witch hunt full of this crap. I think a thread where everyone can test it out will just encourage more of it. If it were up to me, I'd ban the bot.
I made a sticky thread where people can test it out. I don't want to ban it yet, but if it turns into a witch hunt, I think that might be the best option. If someone was interested in /r/mensrights 4 years ago, and only made 2 comments in there, it shouldn't be held against them. Or if they sometimes debate on those subreddits, but take the opposing position.
If you want to know if someone is a reactionary, you can do that manually. If I see something that looks fishy, I'll go to their post and comment history, and it's easy to see if they've recently posted or commented in a reactionary community. I feel like humans can do a better job of that than a bot.
It was in the spam filter, I'm not really sure why, but I approved it. My only guess is that we have had several posts in the last 24 hours with the word "nomination" in the title that the spam filter might have assumed it was a duplicate.
Do you really think you could just walk into any anarchist space in the real world and not expect for them to kick you out when you start spouting justifications for pedophilia? Anarchists defend the autonomy of kids more than the "free speech rights" of abusers. You don't get to come to a forum with an anti-oppression covenant, blatantly go against it, then cry foul.
Nice job oppressing kids, retard. There's nothing wrong with pedophilia.
Can you give me any reasons it's bad?
I mean I knew redditors were retards, but damn, this is the fucking dumbest thing I've seen here.
I would disagree with that comment. I don't have anything against pedophiles as long as they never act on it (and yes, looking at CP is acting on it), but that doesn't mean you need to be promoting pedophilia.
Do you think lolicon is bad too?
I'm pretty sure you only think it's bad because all your live people would tell you it is, and they've been taught that because it's illegal.
If schools have proper sex ed earlier there would be nothing wrong with it.
If they taught them in earlier in school it should be okay. Children aren't complete retards, like everything seems to think. But people are dead set on it being the worst thing to ever happen in the world.
Your original comment warranting the ban arose within the context of your pedo-apologism in a thread about police officers found to have molested children. It never had a context of "just thoughts in someone's head" or something, and you've now just discussed supporting some sort of reformed molestation. Children cannot have prior informed consent, and cops raping kids sure as fuck means oppression. Go away.
Which one of you sad fucks banned me and then deleted all of the pro gamer gate demolishment of those anti GG talking points? We're laughing at you all for being so pathetic and insecure until we get specifics.
"Misogynistic" and "oppressive".... good lord that is biggest load if bull that I have ever heard. Do you honestly, 100% believe that or are you just censoring people who demolish what you believe in? It really tes how secure people are by how they react to disagreement.
And you guys have also deleted the comment saying that the post was being brigaded by gamerghazi but left up the one saying it was being brigaded by kotakuinaction.... this is truly fucking hilarious...
Wait... wait.. let me get this straight because the mind if SJWs like yourself fascinates me. You believe that three people making lenghty rebuttals to someone blatantly lying about gamer gate in which gender is not mentioned is misogynistic and oppressive? Okay... and you also believe that despite my making no actual arguments other than "these arguments" are good I should be prevented from ever participating in /r/anarchism?
Buddy, in the kindest way possible: youre an idiot and you need to become more secure in what you believe in that you can handle people disagreeing with you without freaking iut and banning/deleting. Because this is just sad.
You use those words as if you know what they mean. Pro-Tip: You haven't a clue. Ironically, less than 24 hours ago you had no clue what AMRsucks was. Now you've dismissed the entire community as "misogynistic" and "reactionary". Why? Because the community exists to mock and belittle the insanity, bitterness and reactionary attitudes of /r/gamerghazi and /r/againstmenrights which are reacting against gamer gate and the MRM.
But given that you most likely haven't a clue as to what a reactionary actually is I'll forgive you for not understanding that.
Also, just pony up and admit that you're using "brigading" as an excuse to cleanse a digital space that you feel belongs to you of ideas that you disagree with.